http://john.foliot.ca ...my perspective - without apology Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:57:06 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 en hourly 1 http://john.foliot.ca/open-web-camp-ii/ http://john.foliot.ca/open-web-camp-ii/#comments Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:57:06 +0000 John http://john.foliot.ca/?p=192 http://john.foliot.ca/open-web-camp-ii/feed/ 1 http://john.foliot.ca/thoughts-on-detail-versus-summary/ http://john.foliot.ca/thoughts-on-detail-versus-summary/#comments Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:09:36 +0000 John http://john.foliot.ca/?p=150 http://john.foliot.ca/thoughts-on-detail-versus-summary/feed/ 3 http://john.foliot.ca/145/ http://john.foliot.ca/145/#comments Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:41:01 +0000 John http://john.foliot.ca/?p=145 http://john.foliot.ca/145/feed/ 0 http://john.foliot.ca/standards-are-not-just-stuff-and-nonesense/ http://john.foliot.ca/standards-are-not-just-stuff-and-nonesense/#comments Wed, 13 Jan 2010 01:13:11 +0000 John http://john.foliot.ca/?p=131 http://john.foliot.ca/standards-are-not-just-stuff-and-nonesense/feed/ 14 http://john.foliot.ca/are-we-still-arguing-about-validation/ http://john.foliot.ca/are-we-still-arguing-about-validation/#comments Wed, 07 Oct 2009 19:54:48 +0000 John http://john.foliot.ca/?p=124 http://john.foliot.ca/are-we-still-arguing-about-validation/feed/ 3 http://john.foliot.ca/talismans-active-listening-and-a-half-time-show/ http://john.foliot.ca/talismans-active-listening-and-a-half-time-show/#comments Wed, 05 Aug 2009 05:44:30 +0000 John http://john.foliot.ca/?p=111 http://john.foliot.ca/talismans-active-listening-and-a-half-time-show/feed/ 8 http://john.foliot.ca/the-most-pressing-accessibility-issue-in-html5-today-video/ http://john.foliot.ca/the-most-pressing-accessibility-issue-in-html5-today-video/#comments Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:48:31 +0000 John http://john.foliot.ca/?p=97 http://john.foliot.ca/the-most-pressing-accessibility-issue-in-html5-today-video/feed/ 6 http://john.foliot.ca/consequences/ http://john.foliot.ca/consequences/#comments Sat, 21 Mar 2009 20:34:58 +0000 John http://john.foliot.ca/?p=65 viscously and personally) for daring to suggest that "fail" when writing HTML5 should have catastrophic consequences. The most recent incident involves my exploration of what should constitute appropriate (and now mandatory) fallback content for the <canvas> element. Brushing aside the personal attacks by small and narrow minds, I'd like to explore and expand upon my position a bit further. ]]> http://john.foliot.ca/consequences/feed/ 6 http://john.foliot.ca/thoughts-towards-an-accessible-canvas/ http://john.foliot.ca/thoughts-towards-an-accessible-canvas/#comments Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:59:00 +0000 John http://john.foliot.ca/?p=11 ? I propose a ‘block’ of 5 attributes - 2 mandatory and 3 optional – that constitutes the fallback.]]> http://john.foliot.ca/thoughts-towards-an-accessible-canvas/feed/ 6 http://john.foliot.ca/sticks-and-stones-can-break-my-bones/ http://john.foliot.ca/sticks-and-stones-can-break-my-bones/#comments Sat, 14 Mar 2009 05:42:58 +0000 John http://john.foliot.ca/?p=10 http://john.foliot.ca/sticks-and-stones-can-break-my-bones/feed/ 2