January 5, 2013

Everything Old is New


Logo: Federation

Federation

Obviously, the Devidians Googlians have found a way to harness this surge of triolic energy. The existence of the Devidian Googlian portal means they’re traveling freely between the station in the present and the past.

Since 23rd century technology can’t detect the Devidian Googlian phase-shift. that time period is rife with potential victims. The only choice now is to stop the incursion at the source.

You’ll have to take that portal into the past and find out how the Devidians Googlians are creating this new surge of triolic energy. Stop them and find a way back without altering the timeline.

Don’t worry about Temporal Investigations. I’ll pull a few strings. They’ll never know you were gone. Best to keep your team small, just in case.

Logo: Klingon

Klingon

The Devidians Googlians must have found some way to generate a portal at the station so that they can feed on the humans in the past. While the humans are no friends of ours, a shift in the balance of power in that sector of space could have drastic repercussions. There is no telling if it would be positive for the Empire … or not.

We cannot take chances. You must head through the Devidian Googlian portal into the past and find out how they are creating the temporal fluctuations.

Fortunately, the Federation in the 23rd century will never recognize a Klingon from our time, so you may be able to pass unnoticed.
Oh, and just in case: Don’t kill anyone. We wouldn’t want to accidentally change the course of history. Keep your team small, for similar reasons.

original source: http://www.stowiki.org/Mission:_Everything_Old_is_New

Welcome to 2013!

This year marks the 20th anniversary of the first GUI based, cross-platform web browser – NCSA Mosaic – which was launched upon an unsuspecting public in March 1993. In the span of less than 2 decades, a technology that was then firmly in the realm of science-fiction (and über-nerdism) has gone on to irreversibility alter the course of humanity – yes, it’s that big a deal. Photo: George Santayana And while the history of the web as we know it has a short timeline (when it comes to history), there is enough of a timeline now that we should be able to learn from our past mistakes. As George Santayana (1863 -1952) wrote in 1906, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.“.

Which brings us to the topic of this post. My observation is neither new nor revolutionary – many others are observing and are equally concerned about what I am seeing too, but I am struggling to figure out how to stop what I am seeing: I need to get this off my chest.

WTF?

The latest incident that sparked my frustration comes from a DM exchange I had with a colleague on twitter, where I commented that using justified text has some fairly serious accessibility issues for Dyslexics and some screen magnifier users, who will often see the enlarged white-spaces between words in the justified text, rather than the words themselves. The phenomenon is well known, and is referred to as “Rivers of White”.

When I pointed out this problem, my colleague replied “I am using (CSS3) hyphenation — for browsers that support it.” followed by “Graceful degradation is that the text is still fully readable in older browsers. Dyslexics can always upgrade.

Putting aside the fact that it may very well not be “fully readable” to the user-groups I just pointed out, the comment about “Dyslexics can always upgrade” floored me. WTF? I had originally seen the justified text in question via my smart-phone (Galaxy S III, so not some low-level feature phone), and I checked it in no less than 5 different browsers I have installed on my phone (Samsung’s native web-kit build, Dolphin, Firefox, Opera Mobile and Opera Mini), and the problem remained. (Perspicacious readers will notice one specific browser missing from that list…)

Fast forward a few days, and the following “News” item crosses my radar: Many Windows Phone users report being cut off from Google Maps, and significantly from that article, the following quote from a Google representative:

The mobile web version of Google Maps is optimized for WebKit browsers such as Chrome and Safari. However, since Internet Explorer is not a WebKit browser, Windows Phone devices are not able to access Google Maps for the mobile web. (source: http://gizmodo.com/5973295/google-maps-has-never-been-accessible-on-mobile-internet-explorer)

EXCUSE ME?

Now I’m getting hot under the collar. A few choice searches later, and low-and-behold I come across this (apparently quite serious) Google Groups question: Does google has any “Best viewed in Chrome” official icon or something, with chrome download links? (I really wish I was making this up!!)

Do I really need to go on?

Let’s be perfectly clear: I am not opposed to progress, nor am I looking to restrain developers from trying, and using, the latest in web technologies. Progress is inevitable, and generally a good thing. I fully understand that without implementers, the browsers will stop (or not even consider) supporting a feature (remember, I have battle scars going back over 6 years now on the longdesc issue), so I get “use it or lose it” only too well. But we’ve already been down the monoculture road before, and all these new young developers who are blithefully telling us to “upgrade” (and only too often, to Chrome) need a good shake and a slap – been there, done that. Have you not already tripped over IE 6 on your journey?

While I’m at it, lets also dismiss the Google Conspiracy issue shall we? I don’t believe that Google is being “evil”, but by the same token, they are a for-profit business, not some benevolent charity, and it takes a lot of shekles to provide a free lunch to every employee and guest each day. That cash has to come from somewhere, and so Google will do what it has to do to continue to be a profitable company. Chrome is their native browser, and they use it and promote it at every chance they get: on their phones, their hard-drive free Chromebooks, and via OEM style bundling (updated any Adobe products lately?) Fair game, and that’s business.

However, we, the masses that feed the internet every day, have a responsibility to ensure that the web works for everyone, not just Chrome users. We do that by using and supporting Web Standards, a lesson that we’ve been trying to teach here,there, and everywhere else too.

In 2013 it is simply inexcusable to be saying things like “Dyslexics can always upgrade” or that your site/app/service “is optimized for WebKit browsers such as Chrome and Safari” to the point that it will not work in other browsers, or that it imposes a real hardship on your users. We tried that in the 90′s, and trust me, it didn’t work then either. STOP THE MADNESS (Again already!).

Cartoon Figure: Grumpy Old Man

Best Viewed in Chrome badge - animated
Best Viewed in Chrome

(And for those of you who want to dismiss me as some grumpy old man [sometimes true B.T.W.], go right ahead – it will be your loss in the end. Meanwhile, here’s some retro-snark for you – feel free to use it where-ever you choose.)

  1. #1 by Roger Hudson on January 5, 2013 - 2:28 pm

    Thanks John. Openness is good, grumpy is good and sometimes necessary. It is looking increasingly like majors in IT & web industry are behaving like the oil barons of the late 19th century. Will it lead to a new variant of the Sherman act?

You must be logged in to post a comment. Here's Why.